Obama not born in U.S.


Well, the issue of Obama's "natural born citizen" status due to his birth in the occupied Hawaiian kingdom has made the AP wire, with this article in the Advertiser. It also made it into the International Herald Tribune!
Some Native Hawaiians think Hawai'i-born Barack Obama can't be president of the United States because he was born in an independent sovereign nation: the Kingdom of Hawai'i.

A few independence advocates claim that Hawai'i legally remains a country today, making Obama and hundreds of thousands of others born in the Islands over the past 50 years not "natural-born" citizens or eligible to be president.
[...]
"Obama was born in the Hawaiian kingdom," said Leon Siu, a Native Hawaiian and musician who brought up the issue in a column he wrote on a news Web site. "Not only was the overthrow of the Hawaiian kingdom illegal, it was admitted to be illegal by the United States."

Siu was referring to the "apology resolution" passed by Congress in 1993 acknowledging wrongdoing in the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy 100 years before and recognizing the inherent sovereignty of the indigenous Islanders over their land.

I agree that technically Obama, like McCain, was not born in the United States. However, based on my research I think the most common interpretation of the "natural born citizen" clause for presidential eligibility is that if someone is born as a citizen, whether by place (jus soli) or parentage (jus sanguinis), as opposed to being naturalized, they are considered natural-born. So Obama would be a citizen because his mother was, regardless of where he was born or whether Hawaii was legally part of the U.S. Several previous posts here address various aspects of this issue.

Regardless, I agree with Leon's last line in the article, "I don't think it's going to affect the election at all, though." Still, I give him credit for using it as an opportunity to raise the issue of Hawaii's status.

BTW, the Apology is only piece in a large body of evidence, and it isn't really about the "inherent sovereignty of the indigenous Islanders." For a comprehensive analysis of the arguments for why the United States never legally acquired Hawaii, see American Occupation of the Hawaiian State: A Century Unchecked by David Keanu Sai in the Hawaiian Journal of Law and Politics, Volume 1 (Summer 2004).


Posted: Thu - March 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM    
   
 
Categories
XML/RSS Feed
Search
World Court Case DVD
Larsen Case on DVD
Larsen DVD
Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom at the
Permanent Court of Arbitration
The Hague, 2001
DVD Mini-Documentary & Booklet
Order your copy
FREE HAWAII STICKERS
Free Hawaii
Over at the Free Hawaii blog, Koani Foundation is giving away "Free Hawaii" stickers and pins, and will post photos of them displayed in interesting places. Spread them far and wide!
HAWAII DOCUMENTS
HAWAII LINKS
HAWAII BLOGROLL
HAWAII FORUMS
HAWAII PODCASTING
PROGRESSIVE BLOGROLL
TV Worth Watching
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
The Colbert Report
NOW with David Brancaccio
Foreign Exchange with Fareed Zakaria
Countdown with Keith Olbermann
Russell Simmons presents Def Poetry
Real Time with Bill Maher
Washington Journal on C-Span
PBN Friday with Howard Dicus
Portfolio
Archives
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Browse archives by date
CURRENT IMAGE
Support Organ Donation
DONATE LIFE
Comments powered by
Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com
TECHNORATI
Add to Technorati Favorites
SUPPORT THIS BLOG
If you find this weblog valuable, please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support its ongoing maintenance:

Mahalo!
Or contact me about sponsoring this blog in exchange for space in the Sponsored Links area above.
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Mar 13, 2008 11:17 AM
Powered by
iBlog


©