Yesterday's Kamehameha School rallies



Photo above from the Star-Bulletin article about the rally and march.

The Advertiser reports that "An estimated 20,000 Hawaiians and their supporters gathered yesterday at events on five islands," with about 15,000 protesters on Oahu, about 2000 on Maui, about 500 on Kaua'i, and about 400 in Kona plus more in Kea'au on the Big Island.

Maui News has coverage of the event there.

This Advertiser article digs deeper into some of the legal and political issues, saying "Many Hawaiians are troubled by the depiction of Kamehameha Schools as affirmative action and the acknowledgment by the school's lawyers that the admissions policy is racial. The school, part of a $6 billion trust established by the will of Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop, was founded before the 1893 overthrow of the Hawaiian kingdom and many believe should be judged in a political context." And then later shares this perspective from Jon Osorio:
Some Hawaiians are disturbed that civil-rights laws initially intended to protect minorities are being used as a legal weapon against Kamehameha and other Native Hawaiian programs. Native Hawaiians continue to score among the lowest on standardized tests in public schools, and Kamehameha has long held the promise of greater opportunity for students who stand out.

Jon Osorio, the director of the Center for Hawaiian Studies at the University of Hawai'i-Manoa, said he believes there is strong compassion among all people in the state for what Hawaiians have lost since the overthrow. The state's tourism industry, he said, largely depends on preserving the host culture so people have a practical, as well as an idealistic, stake in not antagonizing Native Hawaiians.

But Osorio also said there are some in the sovereignty movement who object to the way Kamehameha Schools has been portrayed.

"There are a number of people who would argue that affirmative action has absolutely nothing to do with the Hawaiian situation since we are not Americans and the theft of our country does not in any way resemble the kind of situation that African-Americans and people of color face in the United States," Osorio said.

"Their kinds of dispossession have been very different. Ours is a matter of simply taking our government and leaving us really helpless to fight dispossession through law.

"Affirmative action implies that people who have been oppressed over a long period of time should get a helping hand in order to sort of level the playing field. As far as some Hawaiians are concerned and many activists are concerned, it's not about leveling the playing field, but giving us back our playing field.

"This is our land. This is our government. It was our nation. And so, for those people, Kamehameha's use of that argument flew in the face of what the sovereignty activists argue."

In his Advertiser column Jerry Burris notes what he sees as a possible positive result from the decision:
...the ruling may accomplish what years of discussion on Hawaiian self-determination have failed to produce: a unified, forward-looking Hawaiian voice on these issues.

This weekend has seen a series of rallies under the sponsorship of the school on all the major islands. These unity rallies, informational gatherings and prayer services were expected to draw a broad spectrum of the community. This includes not just Hawaiians but others who support the mission and goals of Kamehameha Schools.

Here's the interesting thing: Those rallies will bring together Hawaiians who agree on virtually nothing about the self-determination movement. Some support the Akaka bill; others oppose it. Some want to see Hawaiians become a nation within a nation. Others seek total independence.

But there is strong agreement across the board about the importance of Kamehameha Schools as something that belongs to them, has been successful and is not to be trifled with by outsiders.

In short, the ruling may turn out to be a unity builder with greater strength than anything that has come before. If Hawaiians conclude they are of one voice, one perspective on this issue, then they have the potential of becoming a potent political force.

In a commentary in the Advertiser, John Van Dyke provides some historical background on the trust and the intentions of Pauahi's will.

And Star-Bulletin has several letters on the topic.


Posted: Sun - August 7, 2005 at 05:53 AM    
   
 
Categories
XML/RSS Feed
Search
World Court Case DVD
Larsen Case on DVD
Larsen DVD
Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom at the
Permanent Court of Arbitration
The Hague, 2001
DVD Mini-Documentary & Booklet
Order your copy
FREE HAWAII STICKERS
Free Hawaii
Over at the Free Hawaii blog, Koani Foundation is giving away "Free Hawaii" stickers and pins, and will post photos of them displayed in interesting places. Spread them far and wide!
HAWAII DOCUMENTS
HAWAII LINKS
HAWAII BLOGROLL
HAWAII FORUMS
HAWAII PODCASTING
PROGRESSIVE BLOGROLL
TV Worth Watching
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
The Colbert Report
NOW with David Brancaccio
Foreign Exchange with Fareed Zakaria
Countdown with Keith Olbermann
Russell Simmons presents Def Poetry
Real Time with Bill Maher
Washington Journal on C-Span
PBN Friday with Howard Dicus
Portfolio
Archives
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Browse archives by date
CURRENT IMAGE
Support Organ Donation
DONATE LIFE
Comments powered by
Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com
TECHNORATI
SUPPORT THIS BLOG
If you find this weblog valuable, please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support its ongoing maintenance:

Mahalo!
Or contact me about sponsoring this blog in exchange for space in the Sponsored Links area above.
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Dec 27, 2005 10:14 PM
Powered by
iBlog


©