Boston Globe, July 23, 2018 has an opinion piece by Steven Kinzer, author of Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq, arguing that Hawaii’s unique history, geography and culture qualify it for “some form of special status” in relation to the United States.
|
||||||
|
Hawaii’s quest for a new type of independence4 comments to Hawaii’s quest for a new type of independenceLeave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment. |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2024 Hawaiian Kingdom Independence Blog - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||||
I read the article it is such a confused mess of truths and untruths and just plain ignorance. Though to attempt to be kind, I’ve been on a learning curve for years as to the international status of the Hawaiian Kingdom. But, to make any excuses for the United States’ fraudulent annexation and continued occupation…because “the way things are, are the way things are”, to quote Babe, is just pathetic! The time is upon us, in my educated opinion, that there will be the ignorant, those educating themselves, and the wilfully ignorant. “The overthrow of the Royal Family” that’s a new one. What do these people do make it up as they go along? It’s a wilful twisting of the Nation’s continued sovereignty.
Living Testimony in Affidavit form, under affirmation of penalty of perjury (verified)
i, a private living wo/man, :smith : john, the undersigned, one of the people, make this Testimony/Declaration of Truth of my own free will, and i hereby affirm, declare that i am of lawful age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the information contained in this Testimony/Declaration is factual, correct and not misleading to the best of my knowledge. i claim that i am not a person/fiction/corporation/voter/taxpayer/officer/agent/shareholder/franchisee/resident/vessel/citizen created under the laws of the United States or any state, the District of Columbia, or any territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States or any foreign state or country public or private, domestic nor foreign, ab initio. i am not an enemy of the United States or any corporation created under the laws of the United States or any state, the District of Columbia, or any territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States, or a foreign state or country public or private. Any presumption that i am any of the above or documentation implying any of the above, is fraudulent, illusionary, false representation of a matter of fact or a kind of artifice employed to deceive.
This Testimony/Declaration of Truth is lawful notification to all public servants including but not limited to, Joseph K. Kamelamela, acting corporation counsel; Valerie Pointdexter, Aaron Chung, Sue Leeloy, Eileen Ohara, Jen Ruggles, Maile David, Dru Kanuha, Karen Eoff, Tim Richards, acting counsel members; Mitch Roth, acting prosecutor; Russell Suzuki, acting attorney general; Nolan Espinda, acting director of Dept. of Public Safety; Peter Cabreros, acting warden (HCCC), Lester Oshiro, acting chief clerk/administrator; Paul Ferreira, acting police chief; David Ige, acting governor; Harry Kim, acting mayor; Deanna S. Sako, acting Director of Finance; Stan Sitko, Real Property Tax Administrator, Mark Recktenwald, acting Chief Justice; Greg Nakamura, acting Chief Judge, and is hereby created and mailed to you via the united States post office, pursuant to the Federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X, and the Declaration of Rights of the Hawaii State Constitution, in particular, Article 1, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 18, and 20, also pursuant to your oaths of office and bonds. Whoever, being a public official, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, and made available for public inspection in accordance with section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (22 USCS §616]. i require your written rebuttal to me, specific to each and every point of the subject matter stated herein, within 20 days, via your own sworn and notarized affidavit, using fact, law and evidence to support your rebuttal of the specific subject matter stated in this Affidavit/Declaration. You are hereby noticed that your failure to respond, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity and specificity, anything with which you disagree in this Affidavit/Declaration, is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything attested to in this Affidavit/Declaration is true, factual, correct, legal, lawful, and fully binding upon you in any court in America and/or international courts of justice, without your protest or objection, or that of those who represent you. Your silence is your acquiescence. [Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391]. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.” [U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297.] “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” You swore an oath to uphold and support the Constitution for the united States of America and the Constitution of Hawaii, and pursuant to your oaths, you are required to abide by that oath in the performance of your official duties as public servants. You have no Constitutional or other valid authority to defy the Constitutions, to which you owe your LIMITED authority, delegated to you by and through the People, and to which you swore your oaths. By your unlawful actions, specifically enumerated and described below, you acted in sedition and insurrection against the Constitutions, both federal and state, violated treaty laws (supreme law of the land) and committed treason against the People.
Notice to principal is notice to agent, notice to agent is notice to principal.
The following are statements of fact rebuttable only by verified affidavit:
1- A Scottish corporation calling itself “The United States of America, Inc.” and a Delaware corporation calling itself the “United States of America, Inc.” have been usurping the American Government masquerading as a constitutional republic since ~1868.
http://annavonreitz.com/howyouweredefrauded.pdf
2- To incorporate is to agree to submit to some other corporation or entity. A corporation is limited to powers and authorities of the entity under which it is incorporated. Corporations and their agents only have jurisdiction over other corporations, not over living people.
-28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
-The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia. “Corp. U.S.”
http://annavonreitz.com/public-order-blank-1.pdf
3- The Data Universal Numbering System is a business identification database where corporations are registered, including US corporate government and its major agencies.
-https://scannedretina.com/2015/07/11/us-corp-national-franchise-state-and-city-branches-duns-numbers/
-https://scannedretina.com/2015/07/11/us-corp-and-some-agencies-db-numbers-used-to-impersonate-the-lawful-government-of-the-american-people/
https://dandb.com/search/?country=US&keyword=county+of+hawaii&state=HI&type=cos&submit=Search+Now
4- All three levels of the United States “Federal Government” have been rendered incompetent. The actual Federal Government is still dormant pending completion of its “reconstruction”. Both the Territorial and Municipal Government have gone bankrupt.
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20page%201.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20Mail%20Receipt%20.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20Proof%20of%20Mailing.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/briefreportenglish.pdf
5- The “Agencies”, including the elected Governor, are NOT ‘Public officials’ responsible to the people. They are not organized under the Executive Branch.’ Rodney–Dale; Class v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 11 CV 1559, 2011
http://image.rayservers.com/rodney-dale-class-vs-UNITED-STATES/traffic_filing/_3.15.11%20Rod%20Filing%20Traffic%20Case%20NC.pdf
http://www.amendment-13.org/
6- Oaths of office relinquishes US citizenship; thus, oath takers are acting as foreign agents and are required to file with the Attorney General.
People v. Vaughn, 196 Cal.App.2d 622, 16 Cal. Rptr. 711. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 911 et seq
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1481
(a) A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality—
(2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/612
No person shall act as an agent of a foreign principal unless he has filed with the Attorney General a true and complete registration statement and supplements.
7- The United States Supreme Court functions actually as a “business”. CRIS (Court Registry Investment System) account is what connects a false judicial system to the bank; it is the mechanism through which they access funds that were created in people’s names without their knowledge.
https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-itnj/cris-court-registry-investment-system/
8- County, state, and federal governments keep a hidden, second set of books, CAFR, to defraud and steal from people: http://cafr1.com
9- The unincorporated Hawaiian government was illegally and unlawfully occupied by the private corporation, United States, through force.
UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAW 103-150, 103d Congress Joint Resolution 19, Nov. 23, 1993
“Whereas, the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, The Congress
(3) apologizes to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the people of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii on January 17, 1893 with the participation of agents and citizens of the United States, and the deprivation of the rights of Native Hawaiians to self-determination;
(4) expresses its commitment to acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, in order to provide a proper foundation for reconciliation between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people; and
(5) urges the President of the United States to also acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii and to support reconciliation efforts between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people.
10- No Treay of Annexation exists.
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/treatyprot.html
Official Protest to the Treaty of Annexation, Presented by Lili`uokalani in Washington D.C., June 17, 1897
11- Treaties are the supreme law of the land, Article VI of the Constitution
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi
“…and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
-http://www.hawaii-nation.org/treaty1849.html
12- The Motu Proprio issued by the Pope on July 11th, 2013, (Roman Curia being the highest legal instrument of all corporations world wide) decree that all corporations and their agents have no immunity.
-http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20130711_organi-giudiziari.html
-https://www.gold-shield-alliance.com/papal_decree
13- The bankrupt, incompetent, private corporations, “The United States of America, Inc.”, “United States, Inc.”, “UNITED STATES, INC”, “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC”, and all subsidiaries, all sub corporations and all “State” franchises, have no jurisdiction within the Hawaiian Islands, an independent sovereign nation. These corporations are engaging in war crimes without immunity since 1893.
Lawful notification has been provided. If you do not timely rebut the statements, declarations, charges and averments made in this Testimony/Affidavit/Declaration, then you agree with and admit to them. Pursuant to this lawful notification, if you disagree with anything stated in this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth, you are required to rebut that with which you disagree, with particularity, within thirty (30) days of receipt thereof, by means of your written, notarized affidavit of truth, based upon specific, relevant fact and valid, Constitutionally compliant law, specific to the Bill of Rights, to support your disagreement. Along with your rebuting Affidavit, you are required to provide a certified copy of your Oath of Office; public hazard bond information including contact, badge # if applicable; Foreign Agent Registration, evidence that HRS/public policies/codes and the corresponding enacting clauses that lawfully support them, are not repugnant to the Constitution specific to the Bill of Rights, not in violation to Treaties, and that they apply to private living people. I reserve my unlimited, unalienable right not to be compelled to perform to the terms of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement that i did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. Furthermore, i do not accept nor consent to the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this Testimony/Affidavit/Declaration of Truth is true, correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable admission attesting to this, fully binding upon you in any court of law in America as well as internationa courts of law, without your protest, objection, applicable also to those who represent you.
Affiant/Aggrieved/Claimant further sayeth naught.
By:_______________________, L.S.
All Rights Reserved, without prejudice, UCC 1- 308
c/o 123 kamehameha street
hilo, hawaii, zip exempt, non-domestic, without the U.S.
JURAT
Hawaii }
} SA.
Subscribed and affirmed by :smith :john proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence before me, this ____ day of __________, 2018.
Autograph: _______________________________ Notary
My Commission Expires:_____________ (SEAL)
Address: _____________________________
I cannot say I understand all that the United States of America is or was or will be in regards to the document above. I do see that the name Kingdom of Hawai’i is used in error. The Hawaiian Kingdom was and is the name of the Country. The Kingdom of Hawai’i refers to Hawai’i Island itself…as when there was the Kingdom of Maui, O’ahu, and Kauai before the unification under Kamehameha I. I always like to mention this is not unusual to have several Kingdoms at once in history, as in England there was at one time The Kingdom of Wessex, The Kingdom of Northumbria, and the Kingdom of Mercer until unification, a lot of history there, and smaller Kingdoms to boot! So, not that unusual. But if we are to move ahead properly we must be on the same page and use the correct information. May I suggest the fine book, Ua Mau Ke Ea?
Looking again at the name Kingdom of Hawai’i it seems that it was in the god awful original US document/apology and is being quoted…so I understand now that it is the error of the US document not of the author of the document above. Apologies…